It's time to go Jennifer, You are the weakest link.
You can't handle the portfolio.
Too many claims of "I didn't know about it", and too weak a grip on the department.
Too many sex scandals, which are not your fault, but when uncovered, tried to be hushed up, then it's your fault.
Now we have millions of dollars of over-payments, and caregiver reviews not being done. What Next?
Time to go Jennifer. You are the weakest link.
Get Real
ps: Maybe you could join Chloe Fox, because she can't get a grip on the Transport side of things either!
You can't handle the portfolio.
Too many claims of "I didn't know about it", and too weak a grip on the department.
Too many sex scandals, which are not your fault, but when uncovered, tried to be hushed up, then it's your fault.
Now we have millions of dollars of over-payments, and caregiver reviews not being done. What Next?
Time to go Jennifer. You are the weakest link.
Get Real
ps: Maybe you could join Chloe Fox, because she can't get a grip on the Transport side of things either!
i can only say, you very much underestimate the extent of the problem. the guy who scored the job in charge of DECS, he was from the UK, hand picked by jay weatherill. (that's the uk, is gran still over there and you have to wonder if he's playing the old wobble board while he is. all that time on the rainbow warrior, that's their scene for sure.) his name was keith bartley i think it was. anyway, the way it is, south australia has an international profile. in accepting such a position here from the premier jay, there's a precedent by which the former activities of mr bartley were investigated back in the UK. turns out the organisation he was in charge of back there, they found trafficking in children. he said it was nothing to do with him and that somebody had maliciously implicated him in it. i pointed out, by accepting the job from jay witheroll, he had implicated himself. so, he resigned and went back to the uk it seemed in direct response to that illumination.
ReplyDeleteit's of interest i suppose because there's some contention about what's going on here in adelaide in that field.
like i said it was trafficking, but somebody else with information was saying it was more like they were farming the children. it's hard to make a call on it, certainly wouldn't want to get too close to it. hopefully it can be sorted, if the witness protection holds up. i suppose, children born into the world, never to have a life of their own.
what can you say?
welcome to adelaide.
and you think the bogans are bad huh?